(September 20, 2015 at 2:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You don't -get- any QM evidence though, as an idealist. Do you understand why? That "qm evidence" argues against both your premises and conclusions, and likewise your premises and conclusions argue against -it-. I'll suggest the same to you that I suggested to Benny, google "stolen concept". IDK, I'm starting to think that you're more of a quantum spiritualist than a monistic idealist.I thought you were gonna explain why... not just tell me I'm wrong... why does the evidence argue against my premises and conclusions? and why is the implications incompatible with my premises and conclusion?
I think QM has implications of idealism. particularly, physicists are starting to conclude space-time is emergent from information. and information can of course come from a mind.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.
-Galileo
-Galileo