RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
September 30, 2015 at 10:22 pm
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2015 at 10:24 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(September 30, 2015 at 10:15 pm)Losty Wrote: When you replace std treatment instead of abortion it sounds so fucking silly......
Because it is silly.
(September 30, 2015 at 10:21 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote:(September 30, 2015 at 9:54 pm)Losty Wrote: Touché. I wonder how you would feel if you got an std and half the country told you that you should have to keep it as a consequence of having sex.
They wouldn't have to in alot of cases. I would be forced to keep it regardless due to there being no complete cure. I would also get next to no sympathy and actually suffer severe stigma.
Examples; aids, syphilis.
Syphilis is curable; it's a bacterium.
And HIV is permanent (so far) but totally treatable and suppressible with modern medications.
So, as we've said, it's like saying that because they had "consequences" of sex, the STD, they have to not have the medications to stop it from ruining their life because they "should have known better when they chose to have sex".
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.