RE: Objectifying women
May 19, 2010 at 9:52 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2010 at 10:05 am by Dotard.)
So... Ms. Elio, no matter if I'm waving $100 bills around and some thug demands I hand it over to him/her, no means no right? Then when it is forceably removed from my possession it is still 100% the perpetrators fault it happened?
Yeah, I agree it is. Thievery is thievery and never O.K. even with flaunted temptations under your nose.
HOWEVER, if I had not been waving $100 bills around the likeihood of the thugs demanding I hand them over is unlikely. Therefore partial blame can and should be placed upon the idiot waving $100 bills around.
Sorry that reality makes you sick, but that is just the way it is.
Maybe it's the analogies that are difficult for you to grasp. How about this;
I go into a fag-club with my dick hanging out of my pants, is it not partially my fault if it gets grabbed, fondled or touched by the patrons? If I enter the same club with ol' dicky tucked safely inside my britches the likelihood of my privates being molested is fractional compaired to if the shlong was purposely left hanging out.
Well, to be correct in my case that would be 'shlort' and not 'shlong'.
Yes, I agree with you Ms Elio, you should be about to walk down the street naked without fear of rape or molestation. But that is not reality.
In the same line of thought, I should be able to walk down the street with $100 bills hanging out of my pockets without fear of robbery. But that's not reality.
Let's try to stay down here on earth.
Oh, and as a side note. Stop derailing the topic. Is it the 'game' of beauty pagaents and men's magazines and such that incurs your wraith or is it the 'players' which whom without there would be no game?
AND.... I am NOT equating women and money. I am equating something women have with an interest to protect with something I, or others, have with an interest to protect. Your body IS your property. If you have some fine tools do you NOT build a shed over them and lock them up? Or do you just leave them on the front lawn because "no one has the right to take them"? Again equating your property with property, not the sum of women.
Yeah, I agree it is. Thievery is thievery and never O.K. even with flaunted temptations under your nose.
HOWEVER, if I had not been waving $100 bills around the likeihood of the thugs demanding I hand them over is unlikely. Therefore partial blame can and should be placed upon the idiot waving $100 bills around.
Sorry that reality makes you sick, but that is just the way it is.
Maybe it's the analogies that are difficult for you to grasp. How about this;
I go into a fag-club with my dick hanging out of my pants, is it not partially my fault if it gets grabbed, fondled or touched by the patrons? If I enter the same club with ol' dicky tucked safely inside my britches the likelihood of my privates being molested is fractional compaired to if the shlong was purposely left hanging out.
Well, to be correct in my case that would be 'shlort' and not 'shlong'.
Yes, I agree with you Ms Elio, you should be about to walk down the street naked without fear of rape or molestation. But that is not reality.
In the same line of thought, I should be able to walk down the street with $100 bills hanging out of my pockets without fear of robbery. But that's not reality.
Let's try to stay down here on earth.
Oh, and as a side note. Stop derailing the topic. Is it the 'game' of beauty pagaents and men's magazines and such that incurs your wraith or is it the 'players' which whom without there would be no game?
AND.... I am NOT equating women and money. I am equating something women have with an interest to protect with something I, or others, have with an interest to protect. Your body IS your property. If you have some fine tools do you NOT build a shed over them and lock them up? Or do you just leave them on the front lawn because "no one has the right to take them"? Again equating your property with property, not the sum of women.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM