RE: Objectifying women
May 19, 2010 at 11:41 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2010 at 11:48 am by Dotard.)
And your link does nothing to prove your case. It is NOT about, "well, she was wearing skinny jeans so it's her fault"
It's about judges not buying into the rape story because they were convinced it was consensual (<--HA! Upon proof reading I just noticed that. It should be consentual. Innocent mistake but funny in this context). You seem to believe just because one claims rape, then it really was rape. You seem to think it NEVER EVER happens that a woman will consent to sex, then when she doesn't get a call the next day or the guy says "thanks for the fun" and goes his own way some women will claim "rape" as a retailitory move because she got her "feelings hurt".
Men are never innocent and women are SOOOOO persecuted because they actually have to PROVE a rape occured.
Who's the ignorant one here again?
It's about judges not buying into the rape story because they were convinced it was consensual (<--HA! Upon proof reading I just noticed that. It should be consentual. Innocent mistake but funny in this context). You seem to believe just because one claims rape, then it really was rape. You seem to think it NEVER EVER happens that a woman will consent to sex, then when she doesn't get a call the next day or the guy says "thanks for the fun" and goes his own way some women will claim "rape" as a retailitory move because she got her "feelings hurt".
Men are never innocent and women are SOOOOO persecuted because they actually have to PROVE a rape occured.
Who's the ignorant one here again?
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM