Objectifying women

[Dotard]

Sure, the more visually attention grabbing cars will get more of all types of attention, but anyone would be mocked mercilessly if they tried saying 'You know, they shouldn't have bought such a shiny bright red car'.

I would not say you shouldn't have a shiney red car. I'm saying don't take that shiney red car and leave it unsecured. There is a time and place for showing off your shiney red car. In a den of theives is not one of them. I should be able to leave it unlocked and running as I run into the store. Should be able to cause if anyone takes it, they are 100% entirely to blame for the theft.

Should I do that? No. You all know damned well it's enticing and setting up opportunity. If I do, do I shoulder partial blame for it's inevitable theft? <-- Just answer that one question please.
If I do all the right things, lock it up, set the alarm, hide the valuables, and it is stolen can you reasonably assign partial blame on me? I say no. If I lock it up, set the alarm but leave the valuables out in plain sight do I incur some responsibility for my loss?

Even if a guy needs some power stuff mixed into his sex to get off, he knows full well not to do it in real life, except by consentual 'nonconsent' or whatever.

Agreed. There are many other ways to satisfy that. Paid help. Call employees and fire them as you do the wife/GF. Curse God when having sex. ("Is that all you got?! You piece of shit God! Bring it on! I jizz on your face!!) I felt all powerful just typing that. I'm gonna have to try it with my regular call girl. She'll probably charge me $10 extra, but I think it will be worth it.

It's one thing to have harmful sexual desires (not easy to for anyone to control what makes them horny), but it's another to actually do them.

Agreed.

No, not exactly. Older women party and date less for the same reasons that older men party and date less. It has nothing to do with learning better how to protect oneself.

Less. And when they do party it has everything to do with learning how to better protect oneself.
Yes frequency is a factor. So is learning the way things should be and the way things are.

---

If rape is about power and not sex then doesn't that mean that a heterosexual man is just as likely to rape another man as a gay man? And of course, doesn't it also then mean that a homosexual (non-bisexual) man who is not remotely attracted to women, is just as likely to rape a woman as a heterosexual man?

Doesn't one need to be aroused in order to rape?

Are rapists aroused on power alone and they are not actually remotely aroused by the person they are actually raping whatsoever?

Rape is in (other) animal species too... is that about power too? Nothing to do with genes being passed on into helpless females? Doesn't being attracted to the female increase the likelihood that the animal actually has sex with a female or an animal at all?

EvF

All very valid points in the form of questions. Here's the answers you already know.

Yes. Yes. Yes. No/No <-2 part question. Maybe.(I have a dog that only humps on other male dogs. I really think he's gay and it's not about power or dominance. When the neighborhood pack of dogs are chasing a female in heat, he never has tried to mount the female nor fight the males, he just runs over there and starts humping on the males. I've had this dog 8 years and his behavior is homosexual. I have never, ever seen him attempt to mount a female. So I answer 'maybe' meaning sometimes, not always.) No. Yes.

---

Also, question number two is a GREAT point. You would see equal, or damn near, cases of homosexual men raping women. Or people in general raping their pets or fence posts or statues of Jesus or front lawns (oOoOOoo...power over the earth!) or crocodiles or whatever.

For power trips look to hunters, serial murderers that confess to jizzing in their pants when murdering, animal abusers and the like.

Rape is a crime of uncontrolled mating/reproductive instincts. Evolutionary in it's existance. It doesn't exist for social-power-play reasons, it's biological.