RE: Objectifying women
May 21, 2010 at 1:30 pm
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2010 at 1:31 pm by Dotard.)
(May 21, 2010 at 1:03 pm)Scented Nectar Wrote: No blame, not even partial. The most one could say was that you had a higher than average vulnerability/risk factor.
And who is to blame for creating this higher than average risk factor?
Quote:No. It's always wrong to assign any responsibility on the victim. Level of risk or vulnerability sure, but never responsibility.
And who is responsible for their level of risk/vunerability?
Quote: If you and your paid assistant film this, you could probably make some money.
We are currently looking for a producer. Interested?
Quote:It's nothing to do with avoiding these activities due to learning they are dangerous.
Who said anything about avoidance? I agreed frequency plays a part. I maintain the wisdom gained from experiance and lessons learned about what should be and what is also play a part.
Quote:.... one must never blame a woman for looking too feminine/stylish/sexy. To blame a person for their vulnerability level is unfair and logistically impossible anyways, since there are way too many factors both involuntary and chosen.
Wait... what? Didn't you just say;
"It's always wrong to assign any responsibility on the victim. Level of risk or vulnerability sure..." ?
Assign the level of risk or vunerability.. sure
Blame a person for their vunerability level... unfair
????
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM