RE: Objectifying women
May 22, 2010 at 5:48 am
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2010 at 5:49 am by tackattack.)
(May 21, 2010 at 11:06 pm)tavarish Wrote:Hate to chime in with my 2 cents, but some atheists aren't great with contextual reading, Eil seems to be one that definately good at that. I think I'm with Eil on this one. For directly personal violation, responsibility should be a one sided, all or nothing thing. I think when dealing with direct violations of personal rights/ freedoms, (hate crimes, rape, zealotry, etc.) the better route would be one of absolute personal accountability and one-sided responsibility. On less direct violations/ crimes you can possibly spread the responsibility out with intent, not in this case, IMO.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari