RE: Objectifying women
July 18, 2010 at 6:54 pm
(This post was last modified: July 18, 2010 at 7:07 pm by gameslover.)
(July 18, 2010 at 6:16 pm)Synackaon Wrote: You just don't get it, do you?
I named a few items as a fucking metaphor.
Do you not understand? Indulging in riskier behavior raises your fucking risk!. There can be no discussion.
My name calling is of the vein "my illogical friend" and "you moron", yet you apply a whining complaint as if I just told you your capacity for reason is flawed, your mind and demeanor beyond capacity for rational thought, your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
You are a goddamn fool. You'd as soon fight me who has commented lightly on your stupid absolutism and noted that it is illogical as someone who theorizes that the rape victim wanted it.
This is forum for logic and reason, you stupid git. I suggest you use it.
Prove my statement wrong, that I said there is no such thing as no risk, when ones very existence as a living being entails risk! The only way to have no risk is to be dead, so that you cannot have actions done by, to, or from you - as you are dead.
Except when it comes to rape, things like clothing/where you are/whatnot does not "increase your risk".
I'm positively rolling in laughter at your bolded words of rage. Harsh words indicate a weak cause, and you're showing that you're becoming frustrated because that's all you can do. If you're gonna tell someone else to use "logic and reason", calling them a "stupid git" and a "goddamn fool" shows that you're not exactly filled with logic and reason yourself.
Also being dead does not minimize risk either. People do things to corpses. They fuck dead bodies, they're called necrophiles.
(July 18, 2010 at 6:19 pm)Cego_Colher Wrote: I see, but that is only one case, they don't all have to be one or the other. In this case I would say that the motive was probably not about sex. Well, about it, but not in the manner that he wanted it.
I don't see how that would work anyway, because even if homosexuality was a choice– I think it would being raped would more likely make someone stay a lesbian. I suppose no one said that he was smart.
also, everyone please be nice? that would be lovely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_for_rape
Research points to anger and power being motivations for rape. Though they haven't ruled out the "sex" theory yet, the more they research, the more it seems unlikely.
I'm not the only one I know who's been raped. I know plenty of others who have been raped and they tell me the same. There's another rape survivor on this very forum telling you the same thing. You've been told this by someone who counsels rape victims and has seen a variety of cases, and definitely knows what they're talking about.
(July 18, 2010 at 6:33 pm)Synackaon Wrote: You look at us and see what you want to see. You want to see sexism and an unfair world.
We wish to see a world populated by logic and reason and will do so to explain this world.
You cannot understand until you let go of your desire to see us as the enemy. We are what we are - logic seeking, truth seeking. There is little we cannot understand and explain, given enough time.
If you cannot argue logically, then it is advised you depart from this place, for you will find nothing but aggravation and a lack of understanding.
Actually, I didn't know you were men. Women are capable of self-hatred and sexism as well. I don't see you as the enemy. You're the one getting upset and name-calling because someone disagreed with you. If you're gonna tell others to argue logically, I suggest you practice what you preach.