(January 12, 2016 at 5:34 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(January 12, 2016 at 5:27 pm)Alex K Wrote: Serious question though:
- is there a MO how a potential nukee can get warned concretely that he or she might become subject to the new procedure before an actual vote and decision needs to take place? With clear rule violations, it seems more obvious that one can issue a warning after an initial violation, and then one can ban on repeat violations. But with this more ineffable criterion, how would that work? There should be a clearly defined "nuke warning" imho.
- Are we talking permanent and/or temp bans here? Will be voted on both, or will the first time always be temp?
Staff will discuss issues with certain members when they arise, and if we feel like a member is becoming a candidate for getting banned like this, we will reach out to them and ask them to consider changing their behavior. If they ignore us or continue their behavior despite our warnings, we will move to a vote on a ban.
That's good to know then.