(January 12, 2016 at 8:39 pm)ignoramus Wrote:(January 12, 2016 at 7:59 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I think this is an utter load of useless crap. Users have the option to block members they don't care to deal with - if we don't enable them, then they'll dry up and blow away.
And how - exactly - do staff determine 'a negative influence'? Are there criteria, or just a general sense of 'we dislike this person'?
If staff have the option to permanently ban a member who has not violated any rules, then just chuck the rules book, because the staff have, essentially, just granted themselves the power to bounce anyone at any time for the most nebulous of reasons.
Boru
Tread carefully my friend!
If I have to 'tread carefully' because I'm voicing a legitimate concern over what I think is a serious issue, we all may as well pack our things and go.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson