RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
January 12, 2016 at 9:52 pm
(This post was last modified: January 12, 2016 at 9:53 pm by Napoléon.)
(January 12, 2016 at 9:45 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: You said the staff could ban anyone they don't like.
I'm okay with them not liking someone like EP. Why? Because they didn't dislike him for being different. They disliked him for being a complete and utter twatwaffle who insulted other members constantly and then tried to pretend he didn't do the things he did.
If that's "banning those they don't like" then fuckin' swing that hammer, assholes, I'm right behind you.
You're missing the point.
I agree, ban members we don't like. But when you can ban them for being an utter twat the entire time then surely they are banable for rule breakages already that come under trolling and such like. Rules that already exist, instead of creating an option to basically circumvent the process we already have in place.
I just don't see why it's necessary personally. If staff or anyone else wants to take this and misrepresent it as though I'm knocking the job they do then get all uppity about it, whatevs.
I've said enough so carry on I guess. Just don't see why anyone who might have genuine criticism is bashed down for saying they do and treated as though they don't appreciate the job staff does. Hell it doesn't even seem like people are taking the criticism/questioning onboard at all, not after the response I've just got.
If staff didn't want outside input why did Tib make this thread.