RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
January 14, 2016 at 12:36 am
(This post was last modified: January 14, 2016 at 12:37 am by Heat.)
Seems like a good idea in theory but a bad idea in reality.
I can see staff getting mad at each other for possibly not voting yes, because of their own personal opinions, or staff possibly trying to coerce each other in to voting to pass it.
Even in a perfect world where the rule is acted upon exactly as stated there is still a large opportunity for it to be abused in small or large scale, and to that point, any amount that it can be abused even if it's simply a staff member coercing someone to change votes/agree with them, is unfair in my opinion, given the fact that they are already being banned without breaking any rules.
I can see staff getting mad at each other for possibly not voting yes, because of their own personal opinions, or staff possibly trying to coerce each other in to voting to pass it.
Even in a perfect world where the rule is acted upon exactly as stated there is still a large opportunity for it to be abused in small or large scale, and to that point, any amount that it can be abused even if it's simply a staff member coercing someone to change votes/agree with them, is unfair in my opinion, given the fact that they are already being banned without breaking any rules.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.