(January 14, 2016 at 12:36 am)Heat Wrote: Seems like a good idea in theory but a bad idea in reality.
I can see staff getting mad at each other for possibly not voting yes, because of their own personal opinions, or staff possibly trying to coerce each other in to voting to pass it.
Even in a perfect world where the rule is acted upon exactly as stated there is still a large opportunity for it to be abused in small or large scale, and to that point, any amount that it can be abused even if it's simply a staff member coercing someone to change votes/agree with them, is unfair in my opinion, given the fact that they are already being banned without breaking any rules.
Oh wow. What makes you have such a low opinion of the staff? This doesn't sound remotely close or even plausible. Come on.
It's already been said but I find it quite strange that this new power is announced specifically in the interest of clarity and fairness and yet people start accusing staff of being corrupted.