I don’t see this option as negating the rules.
If a person is continually disruptive, what do you do, make up a new rule for them? That would make the rulebook as thick as the unabridged Oxford Family dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia. That would make things more, not less, confusing.
As for the ignore function, it leaves a notation in the thread every time someone you’ve blocked leaves a post. This also is disruptive when a person leaves posts just to hi jack a thread.
So I approve of the power the staff has to protect our users from people who come here just to disrupt.
If a person is continually disruptive, what do you do, make up a new rule for them? That would make the rulebook as thick as the unabridged Oxford Family dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia. That would make things more, not less, confusing.
As for the ignore function, it leaves a notation in the thread every time someone you’ve blocked leaves a post. This also is disruptive when a person leaves posts just to hi jack a thread.
So I approve of the power the staff has to protect our users from people who come here just to disrupt.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.