(January 19, 2016 at 9:59 am)Stimbo Wrote: I would hate to see that too, but it's down to him of course. The point being that if he does end up getting banned, it would be because of behaviour which breaches the Rules; and not because he happens to identify as a theist.
Would it be considered 'disruptive' if a theist 'sought the last word' in an argument or a civil disagreement? vise versa would an Atheist be considered 'disruptive' in a similar situation?
I think what Huggie is speaking about is the down right distain Atheists have when a theist has rightfully beaten them into a corner. A practice that is completely ignored when an atheist beats a theist into a similar corner. Even if they flame and rage against the theist's personal attributes to get them there.