Rule Change (New Staff Power)

[Esquilax]

My position of Denmark NOT having a secular government IS the correct position, it isn't even up for debate (at least it shouldn't be).

Well, who can argue with such cogent debate as "I'm right, and it's not something you're allowed to argue against"?

See, this is sort of the problem I'm talking about: you collect all these little "wins" to trot out whenever you need an ego boost, but who decides that they're wins? Oh, you do? Gee, isn't that what we'd call a conflict of interest? Or just plain bias?

And of course, whenever they come back up, this is as substantive as it gets: just "I'm right, so tough." But of course you're going to come to that conclusion if you've appointed yourself the arbiter, won't consider alternative positions, and won't even consider the possibility of being wrong (and if there's one thing anyone should learn from interacting with you, it's that you never do that.) Nobody else is as obsessively devoted to their own smugness to actually go back and cover the old ground on them except you (and I'm beginning to suspect you've got a little candle-lit shrine to these moments somewhere), nor reopen issues just to challenge the sad delusions of a religious malcontent, and so in your own little fantasy world you get away with it. We're literally all just watching you take victory laps you haven't earned, and the fact that you can't see it is what makes it sad.

The fact that a church of Denmark exists is all you need to know.

Oh wow, a religious person attempting to hide the complexities and subtleties of an argument in order to shove forward a vague, single-sentence piece of glibness to advance their own position? Shocker.

Incidentally, do you know what happens if I type "Church of America," into google? Or "Church of Australia"? Hmm, I guess the existence of a church of Denmark really isn't, on its own, sufficient reason to accept your position! I'm sorry, I know how it burns you to be wrong.

Also, I'm not sorry.