Rule Change (New Staff Power)

[Drich]

My, that's a strong reaction to me providing an example of an "atheist being backed into a corner" after Evie asked for it.....you kinda proved Drich's point.

Only if you presuppose that your position is the correct one, which I don't. Since I also don't buy Drich's posturing "all them atheists couldn't prove me wrong!" rhetoric, I'm not proving his point in the least. But then, the big weakness that both you and him share is that you both work from the position that what you say is necessarily right, all of the time, so...

Btw don't act like that's the only example, I'll be more than happy to provide other examples if you'd like.

Like I said before: we're all aware that you hoard these things, all the while refusing to be corrected on any point, as always, for years if necessary, just to get a feeling of self satisfaction whenever you trot them out. From outside of the Huggy echo chamber, where such things can be considered with a smidgen of objectivity, it just appears sad.

No Im not posturing.. I am pointing out how 'atheist' think they win debates... It's like most of you truly think the john Stuart method of doing a fact dump, and insulting someone when they refute what you dump is a real way to win/have a debate. it's not. This is all you have done with huggie here. this is just burying your head in the sand to anything you do not want to hear by 'killing the messenger.' It's like "I don't have to listen to you, someone has made fun of you and all you say is now discredited." What a foolish way to try and determine fact/truth...