(January 20, 2016 at 8:07 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(January 20, 2016 at 1:57 pm)Drich Wrote: Would it be considered 'disruptive' if a theist 'sought the last word' in an argument or a civil disagreement? vise versa would an Atheist be considered 'disruptive' in a similar situation?
Not even close. I'm talking the human equivalent of a viral attack. Everything I have said about this has been on that point.
And yes, both theists and atheists (no need to capitalise it, btw) are addressed equally.
I have yet to feel the need to "ignore list" anyone, but my understanding is if you do this all of their 'crap' is hidden.. Why not just do this or simply up the sensitivity on the no trolling/flaming rule. That way the 'new rule' doesn't look like a probation on speech.