And once again it's been pointed out that nobody is preventing you from voicing your concerns. There is no censorship, there is no authoritarianism except inasmuch as a few of us are given a certain degree of authority, manifesting as slightly deeper access to the forum software. We don't have privileges denied to other members, nobody is getting anything out of the job. The system is set up to eliminate personal bias as far as possible; no mod has the authority to go rogue and act unilaterally on high power sanctions, but even if they were to do so the action would be reversed and that mod punished - resigned or maybe even banned, depending on the severity.
If the only objection is that Staff deliberations are held in camera, how would making them public be a fairer system?
If the only objection is that Staff deliberations are held in camera, how would making them public be a fairer system?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'