(August 2, 2010 at 12:14 am)Scented Nectar Wrote:(August 1, 2010 at 11:31 pm)Skeptisma Wrote: I find it simply amazing how doing a little bit of research can make a world of difference. If this woman were truly traumatized, why not go after the bitch that pulled her top down? I don't know. If I am worried about possibly becoming victimized I'd remove myself from that situation... something she clearly did not even after the incident occurred. Sometimes it's not other people who victimize women, they can do it themselves you know!She didn't even stop dancing to get mad at her.
Here's the videoclip: http://www.mediafire.com/?q3ok39j7pyfzd4h
She even laughs about it. A picture is worth a thousand words. There is a vague 'no'-like facial thing at one point that people seem to think means 'no, don't film this', but not only is it really vague, there is no way to tell what it's in response to. Maybe someone said "Hey lady, keep your shirt on" and she refused. Probably not, but legally she doesn't have a tit to stand on.
Oh, I saw it. And, while I might agree with the other posters that sometimes you react with laughter as a defense mechanism, I still find it fucking mind-boggling that she didn't have the balls to make sure that shit never saw the light of dvd. You are right, no means no - but what the hell was she saying no to? It's really disturbing that when a woman is a victim, and I'm not saying she wasn't a victim here, immediately we should pick one side or the other. Either you're a misogynist or a feminist - why not look at all of the goddamn facts first?
