(May 23, 2016 at 3:35 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:drfuzzy Wrote:But passive-aggressive? Jailhouse bravado? Back off, guys. Name-calling, with a forum member that we KNOW is almost always logical, patient and clear-headed? Can't we cut him some slack and open a real dialogue?
If this:
And by the way, LP, a word of advice: make sure you only ever use the phrase "passive aggressive" in the safety of a computer keyboard, or you might meet someone who's willing to get actually aggressive with you... you know, like someone who did a fucking decade in the joint.
isn't passive-aggressive or jailhouse bravado, then I think the only alternative is that it's overtly aggressive and an attempt at jailhouse intimidation. A line has been crossed here. And maybe I missed it, but I don't even see LP using the phrase 'passive-aggressive' anyway. Was it edited out or in a private message?
"Jailhouse intimidation". Well yes. He served time. Words were threats. It's a conditioned response that anyone who had been in his situation might fall into. But we know how this guy usually is. I think this is what I mean by "cut him some slack". The angry post is not his norm, and we all know it.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein