(June 24, 2016 at 10:04 am)madog Wrote: The advertising ban on Tobacco was based on "Established" facts ... when you ban promotion on disputed or not established facts it is a violation of the ECHR .....
The distinction is probably wasted on many that just shoot their mouth off without thinking, but you can claim anything is an exception to that is accepted by Art.10 ECHR if it is just based on opinion ....
So far all you've said is that people who disagree with you are "christian minded," "shooting their mouth off without thinking," and "blinkered."
You still have not demonstrated where the 'discussion of vaping' is banned, which was one of your original assertions.
You can literally just say "sorry, I overstepped with that assertion, but I still have problems with the legislation." Recognizing when you've overstepped isn't a bad thing.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson