(August 14, 2016 at 10:43 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(August 14, 2016 at 10:21 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: I'm just saying, sufficiently advanced technology could satisfy your request. Imho you should set the bar higher for proof of God.
Meh, that's totally silly in my opinion. Sufficiently advanced technology could be simulating deer too, or could be simulating everything, could be simulating the sun. There is no need for that kind of over skepticism and I think most people who claim they would be skeptical of good solid evidence of God are probably not being honest with themselves. The point is that there isn't that kind of evidence
So pick something else or set of criteria not dependent on your immediate senses.
There is no single external data point that can suffice as evidence for God. We are looking for a pattern across data sets.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder