(August 14, 2016 at 10:50 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:(August 14, 2016 at 10:43 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Meh, that's totally silly in my opinion. Sufficiently advanced technology could be simulating deer too, or could be simulating everything, could be simulating the sun. There is no need for that kind of over skepticism and I think most people who claim they would be skeptical of good solid evidence of God are probably not being honest with themselves. The point is that there isn't that kind of evidence
So pick something else or set of criteria not dependent on your immediate senses.
There is no single external data point that can suffice as evidence for God. We are looking for a pattern across data sets.
Well what is your criteria for the evidence that deer exist?