Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 3:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What would evidence of a God even look like?
#95
RE: What would evidence of a God even look like?
(August 15, 2016 at 9:15 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(August 15, 2016 at 1:55 am)Arkilogue Wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_conjecture

Funny you mention "conjecture"!  According to Kepler and other mathematicians, each sphere in a maximum density equal sized sphere pack takes up ~74 of the available space vs the space in between the spheres. I take this to be the maximum expansive constant (dark energy) on each of the identical universes in my model. After I unfold my total model you'll see it predicts 6 individual space-time bends within each single universe.  This affects the ~74.05% maximum. 1/6 of 74 = ~12.34. 74.05-12.34 = 61.71. This is the minimum DE expansive constant (pull of the rest of the universe on our region of space-time)

The appearance of matter in this model is poly-local as white-hole spews of quark plasma erupt across all 6 space-time regions simultaneously and these are the nuclei of galaxies. More to the point, this is a limited spew like a pressure equalization event.  Take a balloon and expand it until the membrane itself opens enough to let air out. Barring imperfections in the rubber, it will be random/uniform leak of air until the integrity of the membrane is re-established. Notice there would be a slight over pressure inside the balloon vs the outside. Not exactly equal.

Prediction: Back to the math, if the pressure equalization by matter spew in our region of the universe was exactly equal, I'd expect the DE value to be the exact mean between 74.05 and 61.71 which is 67.88.....less than half a percent under the current refined dark energy expansive value of 68.3%

This is verging on numerology.  Unless you can show that these six folds give rise to these proportions, then these numbers are just coincidental.  Where do the six folds come from?  The tetrahedron?


(August 15, 2016 at 1:55 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe.[1] Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations since the 1990s indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.

Assuming that the standard model of cosmology is correct, the best current measurements indicate that dark energy contributes 68.3% of the total energy in the present-day observable universe. The mass–energy of dark matter and ordinary (baryonic) matter contribute 26.8% and 4.9%, respectively, and other components such as neutrinos and photons contribute a very small amount.[2][3][4][5] Again, on a mass–energy equivalence basis, the density of dark energy (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3) is very low, much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, it comes to dominate the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space.[6][7][8]
It just worked out that way geometrically.

The first geometry is a sphere. The second is a pillar torus in vertical motion (universe spanning EM field)...picture the sphere as the skin of an orange and the pillar torus as the white strings that wrap up the inside of the peel and dive straight down vertically as a central combined pillar. It's a circuit.

The third geometry is a horizontal disk that spins 90 degrees off the central pillar and cuts the sphere into a top and bottom hemisphere.

That disk is a reflective membrane and cuts the EM pillar circuit into 2 phases of 2 phases each (4 total in the pillar) like shone below...ignore the lines outside the torus.

[Image: phi-ds-torus-cross-section-cosmometry-net.jpg]

Here is where the elements come from; the four phase of the pillar torus are: Inwards/downs towards center (earth phase, toward the real material foundational point at center), downward/outwards from center to bottom (water phase, innately connected and traveling in same direction a earth phase, now cut in half by the disk), outwards/upwards is the air phase as water evaporates from air, the last phase is upwards/inwards back to the top as the fire phase (compression of air makes heat and rises more so that the surrounding air).

They are the 4rth geometry, reflectively manifest as 4 horizontal ring-tori by the disk and nest according to their original relationships in the Pillar: earth connected water as the central pillar traveling downwards, and air connected to fire as the upward wrapping magnetic counter-movement. Earth/water below, air/fire above. The disk separates them into individual expressions.

The 6 spaces come from the number of regions all these nested membranes give border and form to: Inside the 2 inner most ring tori, between them and the 2 middle ring tori, and 2 between the middle tori and the outer wrap of the pillar torus at the border of the universe. 6 total.


It can also be understood as a very simple dimensional transformation in order of degrees of freedom: The first degree is radial being (sphere). The second degree of freedom is polar motion inside the sphere (pillar torus). The 3rd degree is spin and counter spin (disk). The 4rth degree combines all the previous into a single shape, the ring torus. It is space in motion, in place, that has both vertical rotation and horizontal rotation.

A contained space-time that is both in motion, and still, and can expand.



A parallel possibility is that our physical cosmos in not in the space contained by the inner most torus, it might be it's brane surface.

Either way, the ring tori model predicts a slightly negative curvature of space-time, or saddle shaped.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: What would evidence of a God even look like? - by Arkilogue - August 16, 2016 at 9:29 pm
RE: What would evidence of a God even look like? - by chimp3 - August 20, 2016 at 10:04 am
RE: What would evidence of a God even look like? - by chimp3 - August 20, 2016 at 10:45 am
What would evidence of a God even look like? - by KUSA - August 22, 2016 at 8:51 pm
What would evidence of a God even look like? - by KUSA - August 22, 2016 at 9:46 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If you learned that the god of [insert religion] is real, would all bets be off? Sicnoo0 58 4073 February 25, 2024 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Dear Atheists: what would convince you God/Christ is Real? JJoseph 207 10510 February 12, 2024 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2484 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 3375 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 32 1660 August 6, 2023 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 4792 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 8143 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 2888 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Atheists, if God doesnt exist, then explain why Keanu Reeves looks like Jesus Christ Frakki 9 1035 April 1, 2023 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1050 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)