RE: What would evidence of a God even look like?
August 20, 2016 at 4:01 am
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2016 at 4:02 am by fdesilva.)
(August 20, 2016 at 2:39 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:Yes I should have made myself clear. In your definition of the term you are right. However in the normal use of the term the universe stand for the thing that seems to have originated with a Big Bang. Now for argument sake if there was something that is responsible for the creation for this Big Bang originating universe why would that something need to be a part of it? Like a tree A gives rise to a seed that give rise to a tree B. A is not a part of B. I agree you can define universe to mean everything and then all good. However having done that it would mean that we would still need to give a name to the creator of the Bid Bang universe if there be such a creator would you agree?(August 20, 2016 at 1:43 am)fdesilva Wrote: If the universe needed to be created why should the thing responsible for its creation be part of it?
Because if it's not a part of it, it doesn't exist. The universe is a word that is supposed to describe everything.