What would evidence of a God even look like?

[Arkilogue]

Agreed, but the contrast is important.  It is like calling a bubble made of steel, "steel" whereas a solid sphere is much more steely.

Which is an inapt comparison, because you're making a distinction between steel and the space inside the bubble that doesn't apply in discussions of "empty" space as physical. In the case of matter, that empty space is still, itself, physical. A much more accurate comparison would be the difference between a solid steel ball and a hollow steel ball that has been filled with molten steel; we're talking about different forms of the same basic thing, not different things entirely.

So in your understanding a "physical thing" does not need to have any matter or solid component to it at all?

I use that comparison because there is hardly any matter in an atom compared to the space it takes up. Whereas QCD matter aka quark matter aka quark-gluon soup takes up all available space.

Like getting hit in the head with a fist sized wad of cotton going 20 mph has much less "physical" impact than getting hit with the same size and speed using uranium. The difference between atom's and quark matter is many orders of magnitude greater.

---

Agreed, but the contrast is important.  It is like calling a bubble made of steel, "steel" whereas a solid sphere is much more steely.

---

Aka QCD matter aka quark matter aka quark-gluon soup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark–gluon_plasma.

God has a predictable physical component, just like you....your body does not morph as you will it.  God has a self willed energetic component, just like you.....who knows what you are going to say, or who you are going to grow into being.

Why would discovering that God is bio-geometrically responsible for the procreation of infinite universes as finite expression of self awareness that is a regular and repeated pattern???  It's like being horrified that human's give birth to other humans instead of random animals and other creatures by random DNA aggregation.

Stick around, maybe it's in other threads I'm responding to.

I have to publish first and I have to refine my delivery before that.  What do you think I'm doing here?

And that correlates with god, how?

Interesting, very interesting and totally reasonable.

Did you forget to finish your question?

I'll wait until you publish it, good luck with that.

An infinite quark gluon soup cannot be "imaged" or engraved because light does not pass through it and there is no border to make a form. It is "almighty" compared to atomic matter, being more metastable (it would eat atoms or breakfast lunch and diner) and it's gravitational pull would be of many orders of magnitude greater. An all consuming fire.

And this as an infinite body is the vibrational medium for the consciousness of God. The "spirit that hovers over the waters"

Yes I did forget to finish the question: "....why would that be considered a "bad trip"?"

---

If the appeal of consensus is what you need to be able to consider any new idea, so be it.