(November 15, 2016 at 12:49 pm)Rhythm Wrote: "The logic" is -invalid-, that's what it means for something to be fallacious. OFC it presents two mutually exclusive propositions, all compelling false dichotomies do. That doesn't change their status as false dichotomies.
I'm not sure why you're even going to bat for this little bit of idiocy, it's only a dilemma for you god believing types, and even then only a dilemma for god believing types with a myopic view of both the good, and the divine, and even then, only for those who either don't understand or simply refuse to accept the necessity of a valid argument structure independent of ones beliefs. I'm surprised that you don't appreciate the help in responding. But, then, I guess you hit all three criteria, don't you, lol?
Jesus Christ... let's burn all philosophy books, shall we?
I know you're a smart guy, but when you say that things like Kant/Euthyphro's Dilemma are wrong on (what sounds like) a prima facie level, I can't help but think you're not actually versed in proper philosophical thought. It's hard to take you seriously then, hence why I didn't reply earlier in the thread.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle