Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 3:02 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
An invitation to debate.
#23
RE: An invitation to debate.
(December 19, 2016 at 8:50 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(December 19, 2016 at 1:18 pm)Drich Wrote: The answer to the OP's question was both. Seemingly right after the resurrection the people who first saw Him did not recognise Him. However several days after those who did see Him (including Thomas who put his hands in his wounds)  Did recognize Jesus.

A taker?



Jehanne,


When push comes to shove, the pseudo-christian realizes that they cannot defend their primitive faith and remain intelligent looking in the aftermath.
Therefore, its easier for them to run subsequent to them spewing a few irrelative bible passages, tell you you're going to hell because you haven't swallowed
 the Kool Aide that they're drinking, and then go back to their serial killing Yahweh's words as they Cherry pick their bibles to their hearts content.


Good luck in trying to find a notable pseudo-christian for your discussion!  


.

(December 19, 2016 at 7:34 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: .He's a genuine original. None of us have ever come up with any of these arguments. I am amazed at his intellect.

/sarcasm.



Steel Curtain,

Wow, really?  I was using the arguments in question when I was still in grade school!  I look forward to enhancing my intellect by watching
your obvious superior intellect as you engage with the pseudo-christians on many of their Yahweh inspired topics.  I am sure I will learn a lot
 from you, therefore, I thank you in advance!




.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 18, 2016 at 2:22 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 18, 2016 at 6:56 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by brewer - December 19, 2016 at 11:37 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by SteelCurtain - December 18, 2016 at 7:02 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 18, 2016 at 7:53 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 18, 2016 at 11:23 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by SteelCurtain - December 18, 2016 at 7:56 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 18, 2016 at 11:28 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 18, 2016 at 11:27 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 19, 2016 at 6:00 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 19, 2016 at 11:43 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 19, 2016 at 2:31 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by SteelCurtain - December 18, 2016 at 11:33 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by robvalue - December 19, 2016 at 6:21 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Drich - December 19, 2016 at 1:18 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 19, 2016 at 8:50 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 20, 2016 at 12:31 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by LadyForCamus - December 20, 2016 at 10:07 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Drich - December 20, 2016 at 3:50 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Angrboda - December 20, 2016 at 4:52 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 19, 2016 at 2:34 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 19, 2016 at 4:04 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 19, 2016 at 6:23 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Iroscato - December 20, 2016 at 1:25 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 19, 2016 at 7:16 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by SteelCurtain - December 19, 2016 at 7:34 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Neo-Scholastic - December 19, 2016 at 7:47 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 20, 2016 at 1:35 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 20, 2016 at 1:56 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 20, 2016 at 2:29 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 20, 2016 at 3:43 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Godschild - December 20, 2016 at 7:24 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Cyberman - December 20, 2016 at 7:44 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Alex K - December 20, 2016 at 3:17 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 20, 2016 at 9:52 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Cyberman - December 20, 2016 at 7:43 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by robvalue - December 20, 2016 at 10:12 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by brewer - December 20, 2016 at 10:24 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Vicki Q - December 20, 2016 at 7:04 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 20, 2016 at 7:34 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 20, 2016 at 8:09 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 20, 2016 at 7:43 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by brewer - December 20, 2016 at 9:58 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 20, 2016 at 10:20 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 21, 2016 at 8:37 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 21, 2016 at 8:54 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 21, 2016 at 9:56 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 22, 2016 at 12:04 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 22, 2016 at 9:02 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Cyberman - December 20, 2016 at 10:22 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by SteelCurtain - December 20, 2016 at 10:38 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by robvalue - December 21, 2016 at 2:53 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 21, 2016 at 6:42 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by robvalue - December 21, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by GUBU - December 21, 2016 at 7:50 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 21, 2016 at 11:10 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by brewer - December 21, 2016 at 8:03 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 21, 2016 at 8:38 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by 21stCenturyIconoclast - December 21, 2016 at 8:44 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by SteelCurtain - December 22, 2016 at 12:13 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Catholic_Lady - December 22, 2016 at 10:55 am
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 22, 2016 at 2:20 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by brewer - December 22, 2016 at 2:55 pm
RE: An invitation to debate. - by Jehanne - December 22, 2016 at 8:26 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Never-Ending and Quite Exasperating Debate We All Know of Leonardo17 7 246 April 10, 2024 at 4:57 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Invitation for Atheists to Debate a Christian via Skype LetsDebateThings 121 12719 June 19, 2019 at 6:02 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  New WLC debate Jehanne 18 3396 March 28, 2017 at 3:32 am
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 24259 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Big Debate -- Price versus Ehrman Jehanne 43 9752 November 26, 2016 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
Information Catholics VS Protestants Debate Thread Edward John 164 19579 November 15, 2016 at 5:06 pm
Last Post: Drich
  The WLC/Shelly debate -- gone missing! Jehanne 18 2978 October 8, 2016 at 10:04 pm
Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa
  [split] Big Announcement and Invitation LastPoet 77 11160 May 24, 2015 at 9:24 pm
Last Post: Randy Carson
  Did Bishops (In London) Ever Debate Whether Or Not Women Were Human? ReptilianPeon 8 3390 March 29, 2015 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Brometheus
  Open debate: What does Jesus teach? Aractus 130 16663 August 4, 2014 at 8:06 am
Last Post: archangle



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)