RE: What do you think of this argument for God?
March 4, 2017 at 3:19 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 3:21 pm by Jesster.)
(March 4, 2017 at 3:10 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: If the greatest possible being turned out to be human, than that being would be God.
1. God is the greatest possible being.
2. The greatest possible being turns out to be a human.
3. Therefore, God is human(s)
Then we agree on that conclusion based on the premise. I just don't see the point of that label at that point. I would just call that "human". This is much like how you said we already have a universal definition for "apple" before.
(March 4, 2017 at 3:10 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: What points to this as flawed is this:
-What defines "greatness"? There must first be an objective standard for determining greatness. If you have one, is a cat greater than a dog by this standard?
-How do you know the greatest possible being is a necessary being? Why can't I say the Flying Spaghetti Monster is a necessary being as well then if it is possible for this monster to exist, it must exist in all possible worlds.
I was asking the same question about what defines "greatness" earlier. I don't see it as a measurable trait. So far it seems a bit subjective.