RE: My question to pro-choice supporters
July 5, 2017 at 11:52 pm
(This post was last modified: July 5, 2017 at 11:53 pm by Jesster.)
(July 5, 2017 at 11:48 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:(July 5, 2017 at 11:46 pm)Aliza Wrote: The only problem here is that you've removed all accountability for the man. Now he can go and impregnate a bunch of women and leave them holding the bag. I think we should be putting our efforts into creating male birth control rather than giving them a convenient out when they screw up and knock some chick up. There are men (I've uh... "met" many of them personally), who would love to germinate the female population with as much seed as they could if they could just opt out of the whole payment and responsibility thing.
Bolded: The woman is having sex with the man, she is as much a part of it as him. If she notices there is no condom being used, then she is just at fault for becoming pregnant.
In the end, it will be a she said, he said predicament, and courts have been notoriously famous for taking the side of the woman over that of the man when it comes to these situations, because how could a woman possibly support herself and a child in the modern times of feminism?
She does have a point, though. There's really no reason not to pursue male birth control options. What could that possibly hurt? There's always going to be people with gaps in protection, but this would close that gap a lot more.
I don't believe you. Get over it.