Quote:Wow, that is fascinating, and it is seriously more wonderful and satisfying then anything I've read in the bible! I have read the argument that the temperature in these vents would have been too hot for life to form-is that true?
That sounds like a creationist argument. The above article Chuck quoted, was rather deceptive. They created DNA but RNA? No way near. There are a lot more complications for a cell than just creating the DNA. The more we learn about the cell the more complicated it is.
Just because you completely missed the fucking point, i'll sum it up nice and easy for you.
We have evidence of many of the processes required in Abiogenesis happening, this evidence lends empirical support to Abiogenesis and thus improves it's status as the tentatively preferred explanation.
There is no evidence for intelligent design, thus it is not a hypothesis that has any empirical support and cannot be tentatively preferred.
Also, you seem to be backwards (or it was grammar) - RNA is a prerequisite for DNA, not the other way around.
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.
You dont hate God, you hate the church game.
"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine
Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
You dont hate God, you hate the church game.
"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine
Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
