(December 12, 2017 at 11:43 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: As I said before, there is a version of good and bad that goes beyond words. It would be the actual emotions themselves. For example, if you had no knowledge of truth whatsoever and you described that as being knowledge of truth, then that would be false. Just because you described yourself as having knowledge of truth does not mean you have any real knowledge of truth. As you can see here, there is a huge difference between the terms and descriptions we use as opposed to the actual things themselves. There is a descriptor or term we use which would be having knowledge of truth and then there is actual knowledge of truth. In that same sense, there is the terms good and bad and then there is actual good and bad.
No, there isn't "actual" good and bad. There are actually things and feelings to which we are averse, and we call those bad, because bad is the word we use for things and feelings which we do not like.
To be more accurate, you must frame it as it actually is: there are feelings to which we are averse. Intrinsic to the human make-up is to avoid some things and seek others.
