Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency

[LadyForCamus]

Do you ever actually address the topic of the thread?  Really, your constant editorializing without contributing is getting tiresome.  For your information, the last thread about an argument for God, Steve posted a video instead of providing his own viewpoint.  So either you believe that Steve can't think for himself, or you're just being a hypocrite.  Anyway, you can take your implication that atheists can't think for themselves simply because they post an informative video and shove it up your ass.  I found the video to be informative, thorough and quite on point.  Unlike your bullshit comment.

You mean like your first two posts: HERE and HERE

If those are what you think passes for addressing the topic then maybe you should go back to smoking the poles of Canadian truck drivers in Calgary weight stations.

Awww...what a nice, Christian thing for you to say to someone, Neo.  Jesus must be so proud of you for spreading his message of love and kindness unto others.  I think I read in the Bible somewhere, "call women who disagree with you whores."  Tell me, is this contribution part of your, "higher purpose"?  You hypocritical little shit-rag.

---

Further, God is undefined in this argument beyond, "the explaination of the universe". You can replace the word "god" here with literally anything and arrive at the same conclusion. Why not "multiverse" or, "universe generating magical fart"? But, no matter what you replace it with, the argument is equally unsound because as Khem pointed out, the premise is internally flawed.

If existence has an explaination, then that explaination is...whatever that explaination actually is, including any natural, 'non-God' hypothesis that the human imagination can think of. We don't know how to explain the universe, but this argument asserts, "It's god", without providing any evidence, or even defining the word "god".

Ofc, we know what Steve means when he says "god", and ofc, this argument argues for none of that. 😏