Honestly? I think the doxing rule here is too strict. A public post made on a publicly viewable FB page shouldn't be considered doxing. It's obviously not information the person wants to keep private. If they did, they'd make their page/post only viewable to friends. Or, better yet, not post something that could be considered inflammatory on the internet at all. For my money, there's no legitimate expectation of privacy if you're writing stupid shit for the world to see.
Regarding the harassment aspect, I can see it, but I think it's well within a person's rights to take a community leader to task for promoting regressive, tone deaf rhetoric which tastelessly attempts to use the deaths of innocent kids as a way to drive up church recruitment numbers. The guy said it, so he should own up to it.
That said, there's no way to limit damage if these images are spread. The internet is global, and people will do stupid shit under the shield of anonymity. Ideally, drfuzzy would/will tell this guy exactly what kind of asshole he is personally.
So, I see nothing wrong with tying the quote to the post to show that, yes, it's real. I do think the potential of unintended consequences should stop it from being spread.
Just my $0.02.
Regarding the harassment aspect, I can see it, but I think it's well within a person's rights to take a community leader to task for promoting regressive, tone deaf rhetoric which tastelessly attempts to use the deaths of innocent kids as a way to drive up church recruitment numbers. The guy said it, so he should own up to it.
That said, there's no way to limit damage if these images are spread. The internet is global, and people will do stupid shit under the shield of anonymity. Ideally, drfuzzy would/will tell this guy exactly what kind of asshole he is personally.
So, I see nothing wrong with tying the quote to the post to show that, yes, it's real. I do think the potential of unintended consequences should stop it from being spread.
Just my $0.02.