Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[LadyForCamus]

Huggy, at the end of the day you have a picture of light.  That’s all it ever was, and that’s all it will ever be.   You have no evidence that this light is god, let alone the Judeo-Christian god of the Bible.  Hell, maybe it’s the light of Odin’s essence trying to communicate to the masses that they’re being mislead by a false religion!).  In short, you have evidence of light, and nothing more.

I would agree with that.   One might even be able to make a case, that may discount normal natural sources for the light, but in the end, what you have is a light.   To go a whole lot further than that, is just speculation with little to none foundation to support it.

One question I would ask, in a situation with a crowd like that, is if the people there witnessed this same event?  If only the camera saw it, then that begs the question of why only the camera saw it (similar to if only one person saw it).  It may also open up other possibilities as to the source.

Huggy will correct me if I’m wrong, but I do believe several other people in the crowd said they saw some kind of light, but it was only after the priest explicitly said to them something along the lines of, ‘look at the light!  Look at it!  Do you see it right there hovering over her head?’  I also recall that he was showing a photo of the pillars of fire.  Sounds more to me like amateur crowd hypnosis.