Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[GrandizerII]

He didn’t even say that much though.  The person who “vetted” the picture simply said the photo hadn’t been tampered with after the fact, and that it is, in fact, a photo of light.  He never mentioned anything about the source of light not being natural, whatever that even means.  Then Huggy makes the mind boggling leap from light to Jesus, and his evidence?  ‘Well, the priest said it was god,
and he was a good guy so...’ lol.

I wonder, if we were all instantly convinced, and converted to Christianity based on this picture, might Huggy think to himself that we’re a tad gullible?

George J. Lacy, Investigator of Questioned Documents, and often hired by the FBI in that capacity, subjected the negative to every scientific test available. At a news conference, he stated, “To my knowledge, this is the first time in all the world’s history that a supernatural being has been photographed and scientifically vindicated.”

Did you ever think to verify (for yourself) that he did indeed say that, and that it wasn't someone else making up stuff about what he said?