Arguments for God in Quran.

[The Grand Nudger]

Both these answers are very wrong. I will let you assess why.

For number 2, it's really not the same as any perception. For example, it's not the same as how you see the color brown. And it's not the same how you read a sentence and derive it's meaning.

It's -exactly- the same as seeing the color brown, or reading a sentence and deriving meaning.  It may not be for you..but we've already established that w have entirely disparate moral systems...so that's hardly surprising.

Let me give you the textbook definition of the position..so you can appreciate the irony in your "nuh-uh" response.

A moral realist is a person who holds the position that moral statements purport to report facts, and insomuch as a moral statement gets those facts right, it is true.  

As for 1, it's written somewhere, so again, is it by genetics in your brain or what?

-again, facts aren't made facts for having been "written".  Not even in the pointlessly equivocative way that you're using the term.  

You asked a question, you got the moral realists answer.  Do you deny that moral statements purport to report facts, or that if a moral statement got those facts right..it would be true?