RE: Bill Cosby Guilty!
May 1, 2018 at 6:25 am
(This post was last modified: May 1, 2018 at 6:32 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(April 27, 2018 at 8:59 am)Kit Wrote: Searching for a three year old quote, that takes dedication.
Just you wait until he brings up Denmark and his own failure to understand the meaning of the word "except".
(April 27, 2018 at 11:25 am)Whateverist Wrote:(April 27, 2018 at 11:19 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: It's a crazy world we live in, when it turns out Bill Cosby is one of the worst serial rapists of all time. Sad that he couldn't be caught until he's practically dead.
What do you think of my idea of seizing all his loot and dividing between the victims leaving just enough to stick him in a senior assisted living home from which he is not allowed to venture?
You didn't ask me but: I think it would be the most morally perfect option available.
(April 27, 2018 at 11:34 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(April 27, 2018 at 11:25 am)Whateverist Wrote: What do you think of my idea of seizing all his loot and dividing between the victims leaving just enough to stick him in a senior assisted living home from which he is not allowed to venture?
I'm guessing that's just a joke, but in case anybody seriously thinks that - I think that kind of thing might undermine public credibility of any victims of rich rapists, who might come out in the future.
An exceedingly "generous" charity donation might be a better option.
Oh that's a good point.
But I like the detainment part at least. Rather than punishing him just lock him up until he dies.
(April 27, 2018 at 11:54 am)Joods Wrote: I'm with the charity thing. Especially to a victim's assistance center or a women's shelter where they specifically take in abused women and children. We have one in my area.
Yes I think the most morally perfect option would be to lock him up, never let him leave and give 100% of his money to charities for victims of sexual abuse.
I think punishing someone who is never going to be able to learn from that punishment and is never going to be freed doesn't make any sense. But locking someone away so they can't harm anyone and giving all their money which they will never need again to charity... that sounds like the perfect choice given the situation.