RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 11, 2018 at 9:57 pm
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2018 at 10:00 pm by possibletarian.)
(May 11, 2018 at 9:45 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 11, 2018 at 9:39 pm)possibletarian Wrote: I have, it was hilarious
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...u-to-know/
https://fas.org/blogs/security/2008/04/b...e-allowed/
He plays conspiracy theory
There was clear bias by the scientific community shown in that film.
If you mean resistance to fact less claims of intelligent design, I would agree with you.
A conspiracy film as you know can present things in such a way as to be believable, especially those desperate to believe. The film was show to have serious flaws
However this still does not account for the fact that the scientific community reject your ridiculous assertions.
Quote:The general media response to the film has been largely negative. Multiple reviews, including those of USA Today and Scientific American, have described the film as propaganda.[7][11][12] The Chicago Tribune's rating was "1 star (poor),"[13] while The New York Times described it as "a conspiracy-theory rant masquerading as investigative inquiry" and "an unprincipled propaganda piece that insults believers and nonbelievers alike."[7] It received a 9% meta-score ("rotten") in late May 2008 from the film review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes (later improved to 11% overall) where the film was summarized thus: "Full of patronizing, poorly structured arguments, Expelled is a cynical political stunt in the guise of a documentary."[14] Christianity Today gave the film a positive review, earning a rating of 3 out of 4 stars.[15]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expelled:_...ce_Allowed
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'