(May 12, 2018 at 1:20 pm)pocaracas Wrote:(May 12, 2018 at 12:01 pm)CDF47 Wrote: They are still the same genus and still the same family.
(May 12, 2018 at 12:06 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Yeah, kind may refer to a genus.
Come now... be consistent.
This is what you said earlier:
(May 11, 2018 at 7:54 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I presume microevolution can continue within the kind. Kind is a species.
Also, you could answer my questions concerning the fossil record ordering. Remember those?
Kind must be a genus or maybe family, not a species. That was my bad. I responded to that post regarding the ordering.