(November 25, 2018 at 1:49 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:Quote:The question is not, what are scientists speculating happened when this planet and some living organisms were here already.
Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.
If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.
Quote:False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.
You don't even know what a strawman fucking is.
No one disputes that evolution began after the planet existed. Doh. Are you really THAT stupid.
There was nothing/no organisms to EAT this "food" of yours .. for 300 million years. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Tell us, what was "eating" these plants before there were animals around ? LOL
It was not food, until something appeared to EAT it.
Jesus H Christ.
And by that you mean of course that you don't know what a strawman argument is.
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man."