RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 28, 2018 at 8:51 pm
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2018 at 9:04 pm by Amarok.)
1. The authors are both clearly accept evolution and clearly have not abandoned the theory
2. The paper is clearly using evolution (macro) as a solution
3. This Article neither tries nor succeeds in undermining evolution
4. I already refuted it
2. The paper is clearly using evolution (macro) as a solution
3. This Article neither tries nor succeeds in undermining evolution
4. I already refuted it
(November 28, 2018 at 8:11 pm)Nakara Wrote:Because in her wacky view only things that are like us count ....(November 28, 2018 at 8:06 pm)Everena Wrote: What species, (that are not plants), have you observed diverging?
BAM 2 second Google search:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sci...ervations/
Also, why can't plants be used as examples? Are only they allowed to evolve but not animals?
Quote:Oh yeah, the agenda. I don't think so. Children should be allowed to hear the contradictory views of science and not the BS that is crammed down their throat. I wonder why they never talk about FBI Cointelpro in high school history or CIA MK Ultra.Nope it's agenda driven and isn't remotely about " other views "
(November 28, 2018 at 8:25 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:And so here definition flies further off the beaten track(November 28, 2018 at 8:15 pm)Everena Wrote: All of those animals are conscious except perhaps sponges (that are basically plants too- yeah I said it). What exactly makes someone like you think they aren't?
By what definition of the term is a barnacle conscious?
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb