RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
December 8, 2018 at 10:49 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2018 at 10:59 am by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(December 8, 2018 at 10:35 am)Bucky Ball Wrote:Quote:Stevie Weavie Meyer is a debunked fool.
"Stephen C. Meyer is an American advocate of the pseudoscientific principle of intelligent design. He helped found the Center for Science and Culture of the Discovery Institute, which is the main organization behind the intelligent design movement. Before joining the DI, Meyer was a professor at Whitworth College". Wikipedia
Quote:He holds a PhD from Cambridge. He is no fool.
So let me get this straight ... if a PhD from Cambridge says there is no god, (Steven Hawking) then you accept what he says.
LOL
Too bad Meyer's credentials are in the wrong fields.
"Meyer has absolutely no qualifications in biology. he does hold a Bachelor of Science in geology and physics, but his Ph.D is in the philosophy of science[2] which has no relevance to Evolutionary Biology"
Interesting. Do you have a degree in evolutionary biology? How about a PhD?
(December 8, 2018 at 9:42 am)LastPoet Wrote:(December 8, 2018 at 6:37 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Do you want to know why I like math? Maybe not, but here it is anyway.
It could give a flip about your feelings or my feelings. It cares about solving problems through numerical values. That's it. I can be mad at it, tell it that it's stupid, refer to it as "my solipsist friend", or whatever I want to say about it. It won't listen to a word I say, it doesn't care to, it doesn't need to. It's simply there to do what it's supposed to do.
I am having a hard time undertanding your diatribe. Were you adressing someone else?
Quote:Additionally when you try to invalidate someone as a scientist or from a particular study because it's a different field, then you're missing the whole point of scientific study. I have a degree, but only in two scientific fields, but it doesn't limit me to those fields. Actually it might make me relevant to a study in a different field because I can help isolate variables based on my fields of study. The requirements don't change. At the end of the day, myself and whoever I'm working with just need to follow the same scientific standards. If we miss something, no problem. Trial and error is acceptable. It may be what is needed to set up the appropriate parameters next time, or it may help other scientists do an even better study. That is how we we advance our knowledge. Even when we work separately, we're still contributing collectively.
You do not sound like you have one. Is it a philisophy degree?
I was addressing you. We're applying mathematics. If you don't like the math, math don't care. Got it?
Your statement, "You don't sound like you have one." Please qualify. At what point is my statement did you determine that the opposite is likely true? Can't wait to hear this.
Nope, not philosophy. Although I did study philosophy, but not as to pursue a degree specifically in that field. Also for leisure. If I tried to get a degree from every branch of science that interests me, I would spend a dozen lifetimes in school.