RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
December 31, 2018 at 11:33 pm
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2018 at 11:39 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:(December 31, 2018 at 10:23 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: "Complexity" remains undefined.
No one has ever defined *exactly* what is "too complex" (in terms of either chemistry or function) to arise naturally, and thus require a designer.
No one can say exactly what the boundary is.
No one can say or provide examples of "not complex enough" - thus needs no designer, or what the exact boundary is for "too complex, needs a designer".
"Complexity" is a fake undefined category.
Complexity in Molecular Recognition
It's not that anybody has trouble defining complexity, it's that pseudo Internet scientists claim it's "fake." But then again, anybody intelligent enough to Google "complexity" could figure out it's usage.
You are SO frightfully uneducated, you cannot even understand what you are reading.
That article supports MY position.
And still no boundary is proposed.
"Though molecular recognition seems to be a complex and emergent property, a rationale for the diastereoselectivity of carbohydrate receptors was obtained by a combination of experimental data, free energy simulations and ab initio calculations."
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist