RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 2, 2019 at 7:38 pm
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2019 at 7:44 pm by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 2, 2019 at 6:20 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Still waiting for the boundaries of complexity (what requires a designer and what doesn't) and a coherent definition of a "god".
BTW, what did you do all day before you discovered AF ?
-It's not about "requiring", which seems to be the source of your confusion. Either something "is" or it "isn't" If it exists independently, then nothing else is needed.
- Already provided you a definition from M-W dictionary. If you don't accept it, then your problem not mine.
-I did the same things I still do. Adding one thing doesn't mean I change everything else. Still read, write, publish, spend time with my dogs and cats, video games, help out my neighbors, etc...
What did yo do?
(January 2, 2019 at 6:28 pm)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote:(January 2, 2019 at 6:20 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Still waiting for the boundaries of complexity (what requires a designer and what doesn't) and a coherent definition of a "god".
BTW, what did you do all day before you discovered AF ?
Have you ever watched paint dry?
I have and still do. That's how you know when to add the next coat. If the conditions are right, it doesn't take long.
Everything has value and meaning in some form or another, even if it seems silly to certain people.
Good painter = Watches paint dry and even contributes to it drying. Applies extra coats as needed until the work is complete.
Bad painter = Paints fence in poor conditions right before it's about to rain. Blames God because it rained, then 5 minutes later, says there is no god. Still has ugly fence.