(January 24, 2019 at 6:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: [quote='downbeatplumb' pid='1879702' dateline='1548352158']
One problem with intelligent design is that it fails to explain anything about the alleged designer.
(January 24, 2019 at 6:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: That's not the purpose of ID. They purposely do not get into that. They focus on the science which points to a Creator.
And yet all you have is repeatedly saying that because DNA is complex then it must have been designed.
There are testable ideas of what could have led to DNA without the need for a designer. Work is being done on these and although they aren't proven they do have the benefit of being fully fleshed out ideas with some evidence that agrees they are possible.
Whereas the "designer" proposal has no idea how the designer went about not only designing but implementing its design and then you have the additional problem of explaining the designer.
Let me put it bluntly.
There is zero science that points to a creator.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.