Can God love?

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='downbeatplumb' pid='1787629' dateline='1531295171']
The difference between religions and science are:


A: Science is true no matter the context. You don't have to have been exposed to gravitational theory to see that things move towards the ground. But to believe in jesus you must at least have been exposed to the stories at some point.

Man had been expose to gravity a long time before Newton gave it relevance as a theory. Before that man had no idea why their butts hit the ground when they fell. The comparisons you made are like apples and oranges.

I honestly don't know where you are going with this.

Man and indeed everything since the big bang has been subjected to gravity but Newton managed to do the maths that made it predictable and Einstein gave us a workable theory that made predictions that were confirmed.


What does religion give us?


It says when you die "life gets better". Which is stupid.

B; It is testable. All science is testable in some way. religions just tell you that something is so and you just have to go along with it.

God is testable to those who truly want to know, if He were not then I could have never found out that He is real.

Nothing I have seen you or anyone else post meets my level of proof needed. I wonder if you are so easily pleased why don't you believe in any of the other stuff with just much going for it as your god. my wife for example is a spiritualist and thinks she has evidence for a completely different after life than you. Honestly she has books and books on how you choose you life to learn for the next one and thinks she has past life memories.

C: Science is proven to work, religions always fail and then flail around for explanations for their failure. In fact the Abrahamic religions have failed so badly that they now place their deity outside of all reach.

You are within reach of God all the time, you just don't want Him to reach you. Christianity is so successful that billions have come to faith in Christ, just for the record mind you.

You seem to think I have a choice in not believing. That I don't "want god to reach me". As though he's standing at my door holding a boombox over his head playing "in your eyes". Well I have seen nothing that even vaguely hints that there is a god in reality.


So imagine something very silly to believe in, imagine I believe that and I am trying to convine you of it and offer no evidence just "come on you know it makes sense" that's you that is.

There is no again it is real. Then sanity has eluded you. Many stories have been told in the Bible, they all happen to be real, go figure. Just as the indoctrinated inot science believes in dark matter and black holes with no evidence.

You are wrong, dark matter explains the effects they see and is the current best guess but it is not "believed" just thought to be likely. They are testing to prove/disprove the hypothesis. That is the difference. If science was like religion they'd say it was dark matter an dl eave it at that . in fact no, what they would have done was assume that the universe acted like they assumed and not found the anomaly that set them looking for dark matter. 

Dark matter is something made up to explain what science can't.

agreed.

It's a fairy tale to disguise the ignorance of scientist.

No. Its the current best explanation and they are looking in to it.

like it or not I've given you the truth, so it is now your's to deal with.

You've given us what you believe and you assume that it is the truth. There is a difference.

I know for a fact, you could too, if you weren't so stubborn. Why would I live my life assuming something such as God, that makes no sense.

I know it makes no sense. And I know that there isn't a god. I have looked at what passes for evidence to you people. Chuckled a bit and discounted the idea.

You think I am scared of something that does not exist! how silly are you?

 
Scared now or later you will be.
GC

I don't think so.