(June 29, 2018 at 6:39 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(June 29, 2018 at 6:38 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: It doesn't really follow in my opinion, because if God is the source of morality and he must be morally good then how can you place moral obligations on that god in premise #2, aren't all of his moral decisions objectively good as you established in premise #1. Also if that god is the source of morality what morality are you using to form your moral judgments?
If I knew of a terrorist attack that was about to occur, it would be immoral for me not to reveal such to the authorities.
Yes but that doesn't really have anything to do do with the scenario you set up. You said god is the source of morality and he must be good, if that was a true statement how could you possibly question his morality?