(June 29, 2018 at 6:54 pm)Kit Wrote:(June 29, 2018 at 6:52 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote:
Premise 2 is in conflict with premise 1, therefore the conclusion couldn't possibly tie it together.
Explain to me how a moral super being has no obligation to reveal morality in such a way to his creations that leaves no room for denial?
If that god is the source of objective morality and they must be good, then what ever moral decision they chose must be good. That is the way the argument is set up.